eases the Kremlin Novorossia?

[HainanWel.com(e)!]

To understand the big picture, you need to present yourself in the place of Putin. Since he started all this, his entourage, Western leaders and the entire Ukrainian people, and most importantly - the opposition elite knows it, the victory for him - a matter of prestige and a means of survival. About this knows only Russian citizen. Before him, as to a faithful husband, generally all comes last.

"Hybrid war" in the south-east - almost the only chance for us to connect to the Russian native Russian land and weaken the part of Ukraine, which will go to the West. So, I think, then the situation improves. Putin will fight to the end. I would be in his place and did.

All official statements like this from small - almost certainly propaganda move. First of all, to lull the vigilance Ukrainian. Type, time natsgvardiya wins, then we can relax. On the contrary, in the last 2 days more often sounded the word "Kharkiv" (I'm referring to is the new, very beautiful stuffing). Pay attention to the overall performance Strelkova pathos: "we no help, we lose, soon becomes a catastrophe". Shooters clearly justifies the Kremlin gives him an alibi. In fact, this is an additional mouthpiece of the Kremlin. Attention switches from inhabitant problems of our participation in hostilities to lose "militias." That is, the viewer becomes infected emotions additionally begins to believe the official propaganda. Emotional impact on grassroots consciousness - long known way, I always use them in "antibabskih" texts. Perhaps this kind of appeals also aim to inspire new volunteers who are written in the militia.

Paul, do not believe the TV. Generally, if any text, speech or video became known, appeared in front of your eyes, including the web, it means that someone is interested in them, some of their advanced, information from which someone profitable. Goes "hybrid war" between Russia and Ukraine, most of the battles going on in the information space. Are generally not random. All necessary. Random hardly aired.

The most important thing in this war - public opinion, including in the West. Anyone who sway public opinion on his side, he almost won. These objective texts where analyzes the situation as it is, is read only by intellectuals, they are little known))) Yes, and should not be known.

Crowd live TV. And if she fishes supposedly "objective information" from the Internet, it's the same TV))) Babbitt analyze, as a rule, can not. Yes it is not necessary, it needs emotion. And the most simple. Read the lyrics of "great analysts" from LJ, the same Vershinin))) All these Kolonelkassady, Kolmogorov, Vershinin, Wasserman, crustgroup, kolobok1973, martinis09 and others - it's the same obedient mouthpieces Kremlin. They believe only philistines. Or those of the townsfolk that fancies himself a steep analyst))) I have written enough about their use of the Kremlin in the essay "Purchased bloggers."

Determine which of the Russian authors are trying to think for themselves, and who, in fact (or eventually), working on the official propaganda is very simple. If you meet in the journal keywords "Kiev junta", "Ukrainian fascism," "punitive operation" (enough of these three) - that person either does not know how to think for themselves, or he bought propaganda mouthpiece. And maybe quite conscious participant information warfare. Why not?

But the soldiers are not analysts))) This is usually incompatible things. We started with the fact that we want to understand what's really going on. Need to either fight or analyze, or engage in propaganda.

TV reports that "people's militia" lose that "merges the Kremlin South-East" - not that other, as a way of influencing public opinion. Curiously, the crowd continues to believe the TV and that "militias surrender their position under massive fire" - as, for example, has always believed that the militia of the Southeast is mostly locals. Babbitt did not even notice how gracefully, team-rolled wide rallies in the South-East of Ukraine - first on the accession to Russia, then federalization ...

Babbitt did not ask difficult questions. He does not notice anything. He needs a simple truth. If you tell him one priotkroesh a veil of secrecy, then we'll have to tell another, third, fourth ... educate him in geopolitics, or what? Independent thinking for it too complicated. All this eventually runs into the problem of freedom. Dostoevsky in this "Legend of the Grand Inquisitor" wrote extensively. Babbitt never be able to accommodate their narrow minds, that he totally lied on TV, creating a false picture, having no relation to reality. That every single lie, as have agreed. Because we need, there is a war. Started a new division of the world. There all good. Many times I wrote that the crowd has woman. If she finds out that she lied, and totally, she would be offended, "I do not love or respect?" The crowd did not need to know how it actually situation.

I repeat: the inhabitant consciousness, analysis, and not live. For it is more important than feelings. Or feelings ryadya in clothes "cool analysts." Him and represent an image that makes him patriotic feelings. What's wrong? But let us return to our sheep.

Feeling of loss, "militia" is artificially created at the inhabitant. He does not understand what actually forces clashed. Will not explain all the same to him? Feeling of "draining the Kremlin South East" created is likely to strengthen the ongoing armed and financial assistance to Russia "militias." If then our military assistance facts vskroyutsya, then the average person in the brain have a bunch of "militia lost - we did the right thing, that helped." The more profitable power of this bunch? That ordinary people unite around power, overflowing with patriotic sentiments. In case of extreme need will defend with arms. Will be ready to transfer all kinds of tests. If the average person will be in the minds of a bunch of "Russian interference in the internal affairs of a sovereign state support illegal armed groups", as our present business information opponents, what it would feel? What it will be ready? That's just it. Therefore, our media can not be blamed for the falsehood. The concept of "truth" here is not applicable. There is a war, all the media engaged in propaganda.

You can also make the assumption that Western intelligence agencies to obtain sufficient evidence, who is actually fighting in the South-East of Ukraine, and are going to introduce them to world public opinion. Here is our propaganda machine and makes a pre-emptive move. Like, we could not help the weapons? Not help Russian in the Southeast, it is obvious the losing? Are we bad people???

Should look at the balance of power on the final interests, rather than absorb the mood, create media. If you want to understand something. Should be well understood: for Putin not to continue to support military operations in the South-East of Ukraine, not to bring the war to the bitter end - would not only mean a weakening of his personal items. But go down in history as a state leader who profukal great historical chance. At the level of Putin's all just for the sake of history and done. There is no other motivation. Think that the leader of a great power lives in the name of "factories, newspapers, steamships" can only fool.